Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Quantum Growth Learning
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-18 23:01:17
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (49642)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- The AP has called winners in elections for more than 170 years. Here’s how it’s done
- Researchers say poverty and unemployment are up in Lahaina after last year’s wildfires
- Law letting Tennessee attorney general argue certain capital cases is constitutional, court rules
- Average rate on 30
- Critical locked gate overlooked in investigation of Maui fire evacuation
- How AP uses expected vote instead of ‘precincts reporting’ when determining a winner
- Disney World and Universal Orlando remain open ahead of Hurricane Milton
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Ryan Garcia passes on rehab, talks about what he's done instead
Ranking
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Harris proposes expanding Medicare to cover in-home senior care
- Researchers say poverty and unemployment are up in Lahaina after last year’s wildfires
- Ryan Garcia passes on rehab, talks about what he's done instead
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Autopsy reveals cause of death for pregnant teen found slain in Georgia woods this summer
- Derek Carr injury: How long will Saints quarterback be out after oblique injury?
- Dream Builder Wealth Society: A Blueprint for Future Wealth
Recommendation
Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
Firefighters still on hand more than a week after start of trash fire in Maine
Ryan Seacrest Reveals His Workouts and Diet Changes to Feel 29 Again
Texas is a young state with older elected officials. Some young leaders are trying to change that.
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Dream Builder Wealth Society: A Blueprint for Future Wealth
How AP VoteCast works, and how it’s different from an exit poll
Courts could see a wave of election lawsuits, but experts say the bar to change the outcome is high