Current:Home > MySupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Quantum Growth Learning
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-15 08:43:09
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (63923)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- 'A better version of me': What Dan Quinn says he will change in second stint as NFL head coach
- Virginia NAACP sues over restoration of Confederate names to two schools
- Poll analysis: Do Trump and Biden have the mental and cognitive health to serve as president?
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Steve Bannon seeks to stay out of prison while he appeals contempt of Congress conviction
- GOP women who helped defeat a near-total abortion ban are losing reelection in South Carolina
- The number of Americans filing for jobless benefits jumps to the highest level in 10 months
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Sony Pictures acquires Alamo Drafthouse Cinema, the dine-in movie theater chain
Ranking
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Neil Goldschmidt, former Oregon governor who confessed to sex with a minor in the 1970s, has died
- Republican Party rifts on display in Virginia congressional primary pitting Good and McGuire
- EPA orders the Air Force, Arizona National Guard to clean up groundwater contamination
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- 'A better version of me': What Dan Quinn says he will change in second stint as NFL head coach
- Angelina Jolie Details How Bond With Daughter Vivienne Has Grown Over Past Year
- Planned Parenthood Oregon leaders plan to dissolve political arm, sparking concerns about advocacy
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Glee Star Darren Criss' Unconventional Name for Newborn Son Is Raising Eyebrows
US reporter Evan Gershkovich, jailed in Russia on espionage charges, to stand trial, officials say
A jet vanished over Lake Champlain 53 years ago. The wreckage was just found.
Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
Man shot and killed by Vermont State Police trooper outside home in Orange
See the Brat Pack Then and Now, 39 Years After the Label Changed Their Lives Forever
Alarmed by embryo destruction, Southern Baptists urge caution on IVF by couples and government